Skip to content

Improving Efficiency Through Soil Sampling & Nutrient Budgeting

19 December 2024

At Hoddom and Kinmount Estate soil sampling has in the past been carried out on select fields, however utilising the Preparing for Sustainable Farming grant has facilitated James Marshall, the farm manager, to sample all the fields that receive bagged fertiliser or manure.  This case study will talk you through the difference between GPS soil mapping and basic routine soil sampling, as well as some of the benefits farmers can expect as a result of a better understanding of their land.

Soil analysis provides essential information about the pH and nutrients in the soil

GPS soil sampling for nutrients and pH was carried out by Agrovista on 32 fields and basic routine soil sampling was carried out by SAC on 53 fields.

GPS soil mapping

GPS soil mapping identifies the variability within a field, allowing inputs to be applied in a more precise way.  The fields to be GPS soil sampled were selected due to them being arable fields.  Grid mapping was carried out, whereby randomly selected points, one per hectare were taken.  The soil was tested for phosphate, potash, pH and magnesium.

The variation within the fields was evident in the results received by James, with some fields having a greater degree of variation than others.  The maps below illustrate the degree of variation within one of the land blocks that contain four fields.

H&K Soil Mapping GPS 4
H&K Soil Mapping GPS 2
H&K Soil Mapping GPS 3
H&K Soil Mapping GPS 4

Field A was spring beans in 2024 then sown to winter wheat in the autumn of 2024.  The table below illustrates the range in phosphate, potash, pH and magnesium found within that field.

PhosphateIndex range 2- to 3+
PotashIndex range 1- to 1+
pH rangeRange 5.6 to 6.4
Mg rangeIndex range 2- to 2+

Rather than blanket applications of lime and fertiliser across the fields, having these results will allow James to apply lime, phosphate and potash by variable rate, thereby ensuring only the amount required is applied.  Overtime the pHs and nutrient status of the fields will become more uniform.

James will be working with Agrovista to obtained detailed nutrient and lime recommendations, but it is expected that by applying lime and fertiliser in a targeted way savings will be made and there will be an increase in performance.

Basic routine soil sampling

Although GPS sampling helps to identifying variations within a field, even doing a basic routine sample is beneficial to farm businesses.  A basic routine sample is carried out by taking around 25 corers from a W shape across a field and a sample of the mixed soil is tested for the main nutrients and pH.  A basic routine sample will therefore provide an average result for the whole field.

The results from the routine sampling showed that the pHs ranged from 5.0 in some older pasture to 6.7 in an arable field that had recently had lime applied.  Phosphate indices ranged from very low to moderate plus and potash indices ranged from low to high.

Of particular interest, were the results from some fields that were sown to grass for silage.  The grass had been yielding well so it was unexpected that these fields were low in phosphate and potash and required between 2t/ha and 7.8t/ha of lime.  Assuming a crop yield of 50t/ha fresh weight, to help bring the phosphate and potash levels up to moderate and replace silage crop offtakes requires 125kg/ha of phosphate and 320kg/ha of potash to be applied.  To bring levels up to optimum James intends to apply wood ash and digestate from the AD plant; straight nitrogen will be applied to help meet the silage crop’s nitrogen requirements.  The wood ash, a by-product will supply lime, phosphate and potash; digestate will supply nitrogen, phosphate and potash.  Correcting the pH of the soils will also make the nutrients more available.

Over the next few months nutrient budgeting will be carried out for all the fields sampled to ensure targeted applications of lime and nutrients are made.  When soil analysis is combined with nutrient budgeting it facilitates the best use of nutrients from inorganic and organic fertiliser by matching applications to crop requirements and reducing loss of nutrients to the environment.

A nutrient budget balances the nutrients applied from products such as organic manures and inorganic fertilisers to the crop requirement, crop off take and soil nutrient status

Gillian Reid, SAC Consulting

Further Resources

Sign up to the FAS newsletter

Receive updates on news, events and publications from Scotland’s Farm Advisory Service