Soil & Nutrient Network – Case Study: Girrick Farm, Roxburghshire

17 January 2018

BackgroundHost farmer Andrew Forester from Girrick Farm - one of the Soil & Nutrient Network Farms.

Girrick is an owner occupied mixed arable, beef and sheep unit farmed by Andrew Forster and his family. Girrick lies around 450ft above sea level and extends to 242ha, all of which is Non-Less Favoured Area and within the Lothian and Borders Nitrate Vulnerable Zone (NVZ). The farm is roughly split 50:50 between crop and grassland, with some short term leys used as an arable break and 69ha of permanent pasture.

Winter wheat, winter oats and winter and spring barley are grown at Girrick. All straw is baled and kept for bedding and feed for the beef enterprise. This consists of 150 Simmental and Angus cross cows and followers. All stock not kept for breeding are finished on farm. The Forsters also run a flock of 200 commercial Easy Care ewes.


Assessing Soil Health

The Forsters already GPS soil sample their fields on a hectare grid for pH, P and K. Lime, P and K are then applied at variable rate using application maps based on the soil analysis results. Prior to the first Soil & Nutrient Network Farm meeting, around half of the farm was also conventionA group of people standing in a field discussing soil structure at the Girrick Farm Soil & Nutrient Network farm meetingally soil sampled and analysed for pH, major nutrients, trace elements and organic matter. On the whole, the analysis results were very good. None of the fields (including the permanent pasture) had a pH of below 6.1, and the majority of major nutrients and trace elements were found to be at a
‘moderate’ level. The only consistently low nutrient across the farm was sulphur. Organic matter levels were also acceptable at between 4 and 6% on the rotational fields.

Having confirmed the nutrient content of the soil, it is important to also consider soil structure. At Girrick, Dr Audrey Litterick of Earthcare Technical dug several soil pits to assess the soil structure.  The soil structure was generally found to be good, but there was some evidence of compaction. Poor soil structure is characterised by solid soil with little porosity. Plant roots will travel
horizontally and the soil will crack in horizontal ‘plates’ when broken apart. Layers of wetness can be found due to compaction and the soil can have an unpleasant odour as crop remains rot in wet soil. It is important to assess soil structure BEFORE taking any action to improve it. Many problems can be easily worsened by subsoiling or taking action in unfavourable conditions.


Organic Fertilisers & Soil Conditioners

Audrey also spoke at Girrick about the different bulky organic products available and the benefits they provide as fertilisers and soil conditioners. With AD plants now becoming more common, there is growing interest in anaerobic digestate as it becomes more widely availabile. Audrey explained that whole digestates can be excellent fertilisers but they typically contain a high percentage of readily available nitrogen, so storing and applying them requires a lot of thought. Digestate is typically bulky in relation to its nutrient value, so consideration should be given to separating the material (into liquid and fibre) for easier storage and application and to reduce haulage and spreading costs. Whole, separated and fibre digestates vary widely in their nutritional value so testing

The Soil & Nutrient Network group standing inside a shed discussing soil improvers and artificial fertilisers. They are standing next to a tractor and fertiliser spreader

those available to you regularly is crucial if their use is to be optimised!


The Importance of Sulphur

As atmospheric deposition of sulphur from industry continues to decline, it is likely that the risk of sulphur deficiency will affect an increasingly wide range of crops grown on many different
soil types. SAC Consulting’s Donald Dunbar explained that when crops are deficient in sulphur, they do not respond as efficiently to applied nitrogen. Sulphur deficiency is most comm

Table showing the response to applied sulphur at variable total nitrogen and sulphur levels

Table 1

on in sandy or shallow soils and soils of low organic matter as it is soluble, so easily leached from the soil in the same way as nitrate. Symptoms of sulphur deficiency are seen in the young leaf/new growth in cereals and grass. These tend to be pale, with interveinal yellowing in the middle and upper leaves. In oilseed rape, pale flower petals are found.

To confirm sulphur deficiency, several forms of analysis are available. Soil analysis can be useful for identifying very deficient soils. However, plants sometimes do not show signs of deficiency when grown in soil low in sulphur. Plant tissue analysis of the nitrogen:sulphur ratio will confirm if the crop itself is deficient. Table 1 provides parameters for the N:S ratio and when a response to applied sulphur is likely.

Applications in several fields have been split between straight urea and urea + sulphur at Girrick to assess the effect of sulphur application on both grassland and arable crops. Samples of plant tissue, fermented silage and grain will be taken and analysed to see what impact this has on silage and grain quality.


GPS Soil Sampling

The Forsters already GPS soil sample their fields at Girrick on a hectare grid for pH, P and K.  Lime, P and K are then applied at variable rate using application maps based on the soil analysis results. Over the winter, one of the fields at Girrick was GPS sampled on both a hectare grid and a ¼ hectare grid for pH to assess the pros and cons of a smaller sampling grid.

pH sample results maps from Girrick Farm. One is at a one sample per 1 ha whilst the other show results from samples taken at every 0.25 ha

Visually you can immediately see that at the top of the field, the ¼ grid sampling has picked up areas with 5.7 and 5.8 pH in an area that averaged 6.1 pH on the 1 hectare grid.  At the bottom of the field, it has identified an area of 6.3 pH where the average of the 1 hectare grid was 5.9 pH. Senior agricultural consultant Donald Dunbar said in this situation the under application of lime in a spring barley crop is likely to have a detrimental impact on yield crop and performance. The take home message is sampling at a 1/4ha grid for pH will accurately identify variation and allow a more targeted application of lime than 1ha grids. The resulting removal of pH variation within the field will be faster and more accurate.

Ideally, yield maps should be used alongside GPS soil analysis maps to establish if the sampling method being used is also evening out yield variation and improving performance across the field.

Whilst GPS soil sampling costs more than a traditional ‘W-pattern’ soil sample, it is important to recognise that savings that can be made in the following lime applications.  Based on the Girrick field it was estimated that the combined cost of soil sampling and applying lime using the conventional ‘W-pattern’in the 7.5 ha field would be around £789.  Based on the GPS analysis results, Donald suggested a net saving of £435 could be achieved using the hectare grid, and a net saving of £262 on the ¼ hectare grid, when compared to the conventional sampling approach.


Fertiliser Spreader Calibration

It is estimated that only around a third of fertiliser spreaders in the UK receive an annual tray test, with a similar number not being checked at all.  Uneven spreading of nitrogen affects both crop yield and quality.  Coefficient of Variation (CV) is used to measure the accuracy of the spread pattern.  At a CV of above 20%, you are likely to see visual striping in cereal crops. Field showing a fertiliser sower on the back of a Claas tractor. There are two men standing watching the fertiliser being sown during a fertiliser spreader calibration assessment

The fertiliser spreader at Girrick was tested prior to the 2018 season by SCS Spreader & Sprayer Testing Ltd.  During the initial inspection of the spreader, two of the vanes were found to be worn and were replaced.  When the spreader was taken into the field for the tray-test, it was found to have a CV of 12% (good).  Following some adjustments, this was reduced by 3%, when a CV of under 9% was attained (excellent).  For straight nitrogen-based products with wheat at £140/t, reducing the CV by 3% could result in a saving close to £3/ha.

 


Organic Matter

At the final meeting of the Roxburghshire Nutrient Network Farm, Dr Audrey Litterick of Earthcare Technical explained the role of soil organic matter in determining soil health.  Fresh organic matter (such as crop residues and dung) provides food for larger organisms (e.g. earthworms) and soil-micro-organisms, both of which are generally present in large numbers in healthy soils.  Without regular additions of fresh organic matter, the life in the soil will decline, as will natural nutrient cycling (e.g. mineralisation).  This will result in an overall decline in soil health.

There is no “ideal” soil organic matter level as this will differ depending on a range of factors, including soil type, climate and rotation.  In very broad terms, soil organic matter levels of below 2% would be extremely low.  From 4 – 7% is generally fine for arable rotations, with a higher figure better.  Over 7% is usually very good, but this depends on the situation.  Fields in permanent pasture in Scotland will have higher percentages of soil organic matter levels than those in arable crops.  Soil organic matter levels were analysed at Girrick and found to range from 8-11% in the permanent pasture fields, and 4-6% in fields in arable rotation.

Dr Litterick concluded that conserving and increasing the soil organic matter levels we have in our soils is vital in order to maintain and enhance soil health.  She outlined the main methods for maintaining and enhancing soil organic matter, which are:

  • Organic amendments (e.g. composts, manures, paper crumble, biosolids, fibre digestates)
  • Green manures and cover crops (inter-cropping or partial or full-year leys)
  • Return of crop residues
  • No-till and min-till
  • Reduce losses by minimising intensive cultivations and choosing not to grow crops where cultivations or harvest are likely to result in soil damage

The table outlines various sources of bulky organic matter available in different organic materials.

Table showing the nutrient contents of various organic manures

* Rate dependent on phosphate content rather than N content.


Key Findings

  • Maintaining and enhancing soil organic matter levels is key to improving soil health. Applying organic materials like green compost or cattle FYM is an effective way to add fresh soil organic matter which boosts worm activity, worm numbers and other soil microbial life.
  • GPS soil sampling enables targeted applications of lime and P&K fertiliser. Sampling at 1/4ha grids removes pH variation faster and more accurately than 1 ha grids. GPS sampling can be Photo of Girrick Farm, one of the Soil & Nutrient Network farms, taken from afarmore cost-effective than the traditional soil sampling method when taking into account lime application requirements. There are various methods of GPS sampling so monitoring crop performance within your fields can help to determine if you are using the most appropriate method on your farm.
  • A fertiliser spreader properly maintained, set up and operated over 100 ha in one year will apply £10,000 worth of fertiliser, generating additional crop yield worth around £80,000.  It therefore makes good sense to spend less than £250 to ensure that the spreader is spreading accurately

For more information on historic Soil and nutrient Network host farms see Farming & Water Scotland

For dates of SNN events, find us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter @FASScot Facebook logo Twitter logo

Scottish Government - Riaghaltas na h-Alba - gov.scot Farming & Water Scotland Logo  Farming For a Better Climate logo

Related Downloads
Technical Note (TN656): Soil Information, Texture & Liming Recommendations
• Web based access to information on your soils on your farm is described. • Soil texture classes of mineral soils are described and identified by hand texturing. • Liming recommendations for different soils and managements are tabulated.
Topics: Soils
Technical Note (TN652) – Fertiliser recommendations for grassland
The main limitations to grass production are temperature, moisture, soil pH, soil drainage and structure, and nitrogen (N). This technical note shows how to calculate the optimal amount of N that should be applied.
Topics: Soils
Technical note (TN650): Optimising the application of bulky organic fertilisers
Livestock manures should be viewed as valuable resources rather than as waste products. They can bring significant benefits to soils and crops when used appropriately, and their use can result in considerable savings on purchased fertilisers.
Topics: Crops and Soils and Soils
TN685 – Sulphur Recommendations for Crops
Sulphur (S) is an essential crop nutrient that has received less attention in the past as the supply from industrial emissions sources have been sufficient to meet annual requirements for many crop types. As atmospheric deposition of S continues to decline due to reduced emissions from industrial sources, the risk of S deficiency affects an increasingly wide area of farmed land.
Valuing Your Soils – Practical Guidance for Scottish Farmers
This brochure includes useful information about Scotland's agricultural soils and practical advice outlining the upfront financial savings and business benefits of better soil management and the efficient use of resources. Action and problem-specific 'field-sheets' are designed for busy farmers with limited time for reading.
Topics: Crops and Soils, Soils, Climate Change, and Water Management
Host farmer Andrew Forester from Girrick Farm - one of the Soil & Nutrient Network Farms.

Sign up to the FAS newsletter

Receive updates on news, events and publications from Scotland’s Farm Advisory Service